Skip to main content

Rethinking regional recycling restrictions

Last month I gave evidence to the Science, Innovation, and Technology Committee in Parliament. I haven’t written much about it because you can watch it yourself here.
I thank the committee for inviting me to speak, and its members for their insightful questions on how technology has improved service delivery. Since my appearance I’ve been asked a few times what I think was the most thought provoking question or comment the committee made, and it’s perhaps not the one you think it might be, so I’m writing about it here. That comment was from Kit Malthouse MP and was in relation to using digital technology to improve waste services, and in particular the use of household waste recycling centres, otherwise known as rubbish tips. The comment was:
I don’t even benefit from that, because I am not a resident. They are just over the border, you see, which is why we have to pay £9 to go to the tip. West Berkshire residents get it for free.
I replied that changing this would be a finance or waste management decision. This is because most councils don’t allow residents living in neighbouring districts to use their tips for free. It happens because they’re funded largely from council tax, so if I use my local council’s tip I’ve already paid towards it, but that’s not the case with neighbouring council’s tip, even if it might be closer to me. With redesigning the state in mind I’ve since thought about this, and a different approach to this.  As a response to the Coronavirus pandemic most councils introduced appointment booking at their tips, and due to a general desire from residents, kept it in place afterwards. What this means is most people are used to booking to use this service (the vast majority online) and there’s a record of who used each tip and when, and where they live, or to be less precise for our purposes, which council area they live in. There are examples of a more joined up approach to regionally operated public services. When I book a train ticket through one operator, it might actually be a number of train operating companies that are providing the service, depending where and how long my journey is. This is possible because ORCATS or the Operational Research Computerised Allocation of Tickets to Services which is used for real time reservation and revenue sharing on tickets between train operating companies.  It’s been around since the 1970s, and I understand it runs on an old mainframe, which is not without issues, but it does show that the technology to move funding between providers of regional public services for use at the point of delivery has existed for around 50 years. So now booking is in place, why not a similar national approach for tips?  Being able to use your local tip, whoever it's operated by, would reduce travel and therefore pollution and carbon emissions, potentially increase recycling rates, and maybe even reduce fly-tipping, as well as just making life easier for people. Thinking more widely, why couldn’t a similar approach be used for other services that are delivered in person by councils?  My original answer still stands; it’s a finance or management decision for two councils to agree on the use of their facilities, but a comment about a £9 fee highlights an opportunity to re-imagine how we deliver public services in a more joined-up, user-focused way.  We have the digital infrastructure, public appetite, and clear environmental and social benefits, but even with motivation at a local level, it would need a national initiative to make it happen to look beyond local boundaries and deliver services around people’s lives and locations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Digital best practice checklist

This week I finished the draft of a digital best practice check-list. It's not digital strategy, in fact I'm increasingly thinking organisations don't need a digital strategy, they need a delivery strategy. My draft has check-list of seven questions and recommendations, with one overall recommendation regarding best practice for delivering digital. Ideally it would be incorporated into a wider service and information delivery strategy. Below I've omitted the bulk of the content, the reasoning behind arriving at the recommendation from the question because it's still in draft, but here are the seven questions and eight recommendations: 1. Is the council properly promoting its digital services and content, to reduce avoidable contact? Recommendation: Establish a “digital first” ethos to the promotion of services and better targeting what, when and where they're promoted. 2. Are the digital services the council offers, especially where the design and...
5 comments
Read more

Carl's Conundrum of Internal Influence

I'm writing this partly as a reply to an excellent piece that Carl Haggerty published about the disconnect between internal and external influence and partly due to various conversations over the past month about how to make using tools like collaboration platform  Pipeline common practice. This isn't really about Carl though, or Devon County Council, or any other council specifically, it's more a comment on the influence of digital teams in local governments, or lack of, and how to resolve this. So here's the question that prompted this piece. How can someone who's been recognised nationally for their work, first by winning the Guardian's Leadership Excellent Award and who has more recently been placed in the top 100 of the Local Government Chronicle's most influential people in local government , "sometimes feel rather isolated and disconnected to the power and influence internally". First, let's consider whether is this a problem to...
6 comments
Read more

Pipeline Alpha

In September 2014, officers from 25 councils met in Guildford to discuss a platform to enable collaboration across Local Government. A "Kickstarter for local government" is the missing part to Makers Project Teams , a concept to enable collaborative working across different organisations put forward by LGMakers the design and development strand of LocalGov Digital . Based on the user needs captured at the event, LGMakers created collaboration platform Pipeline and by October people from over 50 councils had signed up . Pipeline is an Alpha, a prototype set up to evaluate how a Kickstarter for councils might work. It is a working site though, and is being used as the platform it is eventually intended to be, at present without some of finer features a live offer might have. So what have I've learnt in the eight months since we launched Pipeline? There's a strong desire to collaborate  LocalGov Digital isn't a funded programme. I wrote about how much it ...
1 comment
Read more

Superfast highways

You may have seen this slide I put together to help explain digital transformation This week we launched a new beta service to report speeding traffic. It looks fairly simple but to give you an idea of what's happening in the background I thought it might be useful to show you the before and after. So here's the before and as you can see it's completely a manual process. Stuff might be recorded electronically but it takes someone to do something seven time to make the process work and send it to the parish or the district. Here's the after What this doesn't tell you is that it's basing whether the request is for the parish or district on three questions. It's also doing a spatial look up to find the parish and returning the parish clerk details using the Modern.Gov API. Because these are already part of our platform this is data that we currently maintain, so there's no additional work to keep this up to date and we've reduced the h...
1 comment
Read more

Defining transformation to a wider audience

For the past month I've been putting together a paper on the next steps of digital transformation, for the organisation I work for. I'm proposing we look at two capabilities and two business areas, and if approved I'll be writing more about it. It's been a great exercise in gathering my thoughts and helping me to define digital transformation to a wider audience and how it fits into the bigger picture of service improvement. Here's some of the stuff I've learnt or had affirmed: Transformation, digital or not, starts with understanding the needs of the user through research. This should be obvious, but in local government too often I've seen "build it and they will come" approach applied. It's unlikely a commercial operation would launch a new product without first researching the market, so why would a digital service be any difference? A couple of years ago I wrote how the phrase "digital transformation" was hindering digit...
1 comment
Read more